TurboGFP can be expressed and detected in a wide range of organisms including cold-blooded animals. Mammalian cells transiently transfected with TurboGFP expression vectors produce bright fluorescence in 8-10 hrs after transfection. No cytotoxic effects or visible protein aggregation are observed. TurboGFP can be used in multicolor labeling applications with blue, true-yellow, red, and far-red fluorescent dyes.
![]() | TurboGFP expression in transiently transfected mammalian cells.
|
|---|
TurboGFP suitability to generate stably transfected cells has been proven by Marinpharm company.
Despite its dimeric structure, TurboGFP performs well in some fusions. However, for protein labeling applications we recommend using specially optimized monomeric TagFPs.
TurboGFP maturation kinetics: TurboGFP allows monitoring the activity from early promoters. It matures noticeably faster than EGFP and most other fluorescent proteins. This difference in performance is illustrated here using both in vitro analysis of TurboGFP and EGFP refolding and maturation kinetics and in vivo examination of the developing Xenopus embrios expressing either TurboGFP or EGFP.
| Fluorescent protein | Refolding half-time, s | Maturation half-time,s | kox (10-4s-1) | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samples of fluorescent proteins were heated to 95°C in denaturation solution (8 M urea, 1 mM DTT) for 4 min. Refolding reactions were initiated upon 100-fold dilution into the renaturation buffer (35 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 1 mM DTT). In maturation assay, 5 mM freshly dissolved dithionite was added to the denaturation solution [Reid and Flynn, 1997]. Due to the instability of dithionite at high temperatures, to provide for complete chromophore reduction the sample was cooled to 25°C and the addition of 5 mM dithionite followed by heating to 5°C were repeated. Protein refolding and maturation were followed by measuring the recovery of fluorescence using Varian Cary Eclipse Fluorescence Spectrophotometer, chamber temperature maintained at 25°C. Maturation rate constants (kox) were determined by computer-fitting the kinetic data to the first order exponential decay (Origin 6.0). | ||||||
| EGFP | 90.6 | 3915 | 1.77 | Evdokimov et al., 2006 | ||
| Venus | 46.2 | 4076 | 1.70 | Kremers et al., 2006 | ||
| SYFP2 | 69.3 | 3300 | 2.10 | Kremers et al., 2006 | ||
| TurboGFP | 11.0 | 1468 | 4.72 | Evdokimov et al., 2006 | ||
![]() | ![]() | Comparison of EGFP (violet lines) and TurboGFP (green lines) refolding and maturation speed in vitro.Normalized fluorescence recovery plots are shown. (A) — refolding kinetics; (B) — chromophore maturation kinetics. |
|---|
![]() | ![]() | In vivo comparison of TurboGFP and EGFP maturation in developing Xenopus embryosVectors encoding TurboGFP and EGFP under the control of CMV promoter were microinjected into animal poles of Xenopus embryos at the stage of two blastomeres. Living embryos were then photographed from the animal pole at the middle and late gastrula stages. Experimental data were presented by Dr. A. Zaraisky, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, RAS (Moscow, Russia). |
|---|