
|
Green fluorescent protein TurboGFP
- Extra fast protein maturation
- Bright green fluorescence
- Proven suitability to generate stably transfected cell lines
- Efficient maturation at a wide range of temperatures
Performance and useTurboGFP can be expressed and detected in a wide range of organisms including cold-blooded animals. Mammalian cells transiently transfected with TurboGFP expression vectors give bright fluorescent signals within 8-10 hrs after transfection. No cell toxic effects and visible protein aggregation are observed.  | TurboGFP expression in transiently transfected mammalian cells. |
|---|
TurboGFP suitability to generate stably transfected cells has been proven by Marinpharm company. Variuos cell lines expressing TurboGFP are commercially available. Despite its dimeric structure, TurboGFP is suitable for generation of fusions. However, we recommend that you use specially optimized protein localization TagFPs to select a reporter for such purposes. TurboGFP maturation kinetics: TurboGFP allows monitoring the activity from early promoters. It matures noticeably faster than EGFP and most other fluorescent proteins. This difference in performance is illustrated here using both in vitro analysis of TurboGFP and EGFP refolding and maturation kinetics and in vivo examination of the developing Xenopus embrios expressing either TurboGFP or EGFP. In vitro comparison of TurboGFP refolding and maturation kinetics with that of other fluorescent proteins showed higher TurboGFP maturation rate. Refolding and maturation kinetics of TurboGFP and some other fluorescent proteins in vitro| Fluorescent protein | Refolding half-time, s | Maturation half-time,s | kox (10-4s-1) | Reference |
|---|
| Samples of fluorescent proteins were heated to 95oC in denaturation solution (8 M urea, 1 mM DTT) for 4 min.Refolding reactions were initiated upon 100-fold dilution into the renaturation buffer(35 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 1 mM DTT).In maturation assay, 5 mM freshly dissolved dithionite was added to the denaturation solution [Reid and Flynn, 1997].Due to the instability of dithionite at high temperatures,to provide for complete chromophore reductionthe sample was cooled to 25oC and the addition of 5 mM dithionitefollowed by heating to 5oC were repeated.Protein refolding and maturation were followed by measuring the recovery of fluorescenceusing Varian Cary Eclipse Fluorescence Spectrophotometer,chamber temperature maintained at 25oC.Maturation rate constants (kox) were determined by computer-fitting the kinetic data to the first order exponential decay (Origin 6.0). | | EGFP | 90.6 | 3915 | 1.77 | Evdokimov et al., 2006 | | Venus | 46.2 | 4076 | 1.70 | Kremers et al., 2006 | | SYFP2 | 69.3 | 3300 | 2.10 | Kremers et al., 2006 | | TurboGFP | 11.0 | 1468 | 4.72 | Evdokimov et al., 2006 |  |  | Comparison of EGFP (violet lines) and TurboGFP (green lines) refolding and maturation speed in vitro.Normalized fluorescence recovery plots are shown.
(A) — refolding kinetics;
(B) — chromophore maturation kinetics. |
|---|
In vivo examination of developing Xenopus embryos microinjected with vectors comprising either TurboGFP or EGFP under the control of CMV promoter showed bright fluorescence of TurboGFP immediately after midblastula transition, when gene expression is activated. At the same time, EGFP was practically invisible at this developmental stage. This example clearly demonstrates that TurboGFP is a better tool to study transgenic expression in rapidly developing embryos at early stages.  |  | In vivo comparison of TurboGFP and EGFP maturation in developing Xenopus embryosVectors expressing the respective fluorescent proteins under the control of CMV promoter were microinjected into animal poles of Xenopus embryos at the stage of two blastomeres. Living embryos were then photographed from the animal pole at the middle and late gastrula stages.
Experimental data were presented by Dr. A. Zaraisky, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, RAS (Moscow, Russia). |
|---|
References:
- Evdokimov AG, Pokross ME, Egorov NS, Zaraisky AG, Yampolsky IV, Merzlyak EM, Shkoporov AN, Sander I, Lukyanov KA, Chudakov DM. Structural basis for the fast maturation of Arthropoda green fluorescent protein. EMBO Rep. 2006; 7 (10):1006-12. / pmid: 16936637
- Kremers GJ, Goedhart J, van Munster EB, Gadella TW. Cyan and yellow super fluorescent proteins with improved brightness, protein folding, and FRET Forster radius. Biochemistry. 2006; 45 (21):6570-80. / pmid: 16716067
- Reid BG, Flynn GC. Chromophore formation in green fluorescent protein. Biochemistry. 1997; 36 (22):6786-91. / pmid: 9184161
|